Autism and Development Disorders Essay

This article was establish on research done on children come alongs ternary to ten years around the nature and reactions of children with Autism. It discusses the differences in the midst of those with Autism, and those without autism, specific all toldy how they react, perceive, and outmatch certain developmental musts in childhood. These results are taken from the chelarens mien Questionnaire, which precede the sixteen dimensions of child perceptions, which includes activity level, anger and frustration, approach and withdrawal, and problems focusing. These are scarce a few behaviors they suggest help distinguish between children, as well as the antithetical reactions that may suggest Autism is present in a child. This article then discusses how they went about testing the sorts of diverse children. They had one sort out as a enclose, kids that had previously been tested on the Child Autism Rating Scale and proved negatively to having Autism, and a group of kids that when previously tested, proved positive for Autism. They wanted to chatter how the Affect Regulation, and temperament varied between the groups.To test this Konstantareas and Stewart gathered a test group of nineteen children all with previous proven forms of Autism and tested them with a created demographic Questionnaire. In this questionnaire it asks what rating a child received on the Child Autism Rating Scale, as well as investigating the income bracket in which each family would be placed, as well as an additional question to figure out the childs level of cognitive functioning. examen what Kostantareas and Stewart call the DP II which is a rating for children from birth to age nine, tapping into stills in five areas of functioning, including physical, self-help, social, academic, and communication. After all of the data was compile all of the children with Autism Spectrum were combined and used to determine if they had Affect Regulation. The results indicated that the chil dren with ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) were more likely to exercise their lower level ofAR strategies, such as trying to get over an object or carry on in longer, rather than to ask if they could keep the object or immediately return it to the experimenter.This experiment also suggests that those diagnosed with ASD per make worsened than the control group without ASD, suggesting those with Autism fulfil at a lower regulation than those without. After reading this article and gathering all the information, Ive formed my own ideas on Konstantareas and Stewarts findings. In their later analysis on what they found, they suggest that children with ASD develop slower, and are found to be less suitable than those who dont. I feel there was flaw in this testing, rather of comparing these ASD patients with a control group they should be compared to others with ASD in opposite settings. This study suggests some limitations posed by the collecting of data, including assumptions made based on previous research, and the flawed collection places couldve resulted in skewed findings. They collected this information over the phone via the parents in a control live setting. Other contri simplyors in this study suggest that perhaps a more completed path to measure a childs AR would be in a less controlled setting such as school, or home.This would help with the data collected to be more immaculate because the tested children would be more comfortable in their environment, and may perform better in a comfortable place. Which I agree with, the only commission to see how a child truly acts, and reacts to certain problems is to see them in the environment theyre used to, children are susceptible and crapper be swayed easily by something they see in a control room setting. In this article it suggests that cognitive development is solely coupled to AR, which I think is false. To say that Affect Regulation is the only way to successfully measure a childs growth is an unfaithful way to think, I think however that a childs growth is measured by a number of things not effective how they measure on a scale of AR. This article also suggests that lead temperament scales is a way to better measure children with and without ASD. I take issue completely and feel the only way to receive accurate results in the measurement of a childs temperament is to alter how the results overall were collected, not the scale they were measured on.This change should take the stand these ASD children individually kinda of lumping them together in a sample on a scale. The nett thing this article suggests is creating some comparisons in and between subgroups, limiting factors to subcategories andtrends from inside the group as a whole, once again not representing the individuals but a group of similar ASD children, no exceptions accounted for. There are a few things about this article I agree with. It suggests that childrens feelings for find ASD cannot be properly measured by interviews, because children with ASD do not on a regular basis show feelings, and when they do express them in a very different way than those without ASD. It suggests that a new study should be done to show the true temperament (pg. 10) of the kids in order to achieve the most accurate results.These researchers should find children with ASD that have both extremely severe cases, and those with more minor cases, test them against each other, and compare them to the differences of those without any form of ASD. If done this suggested way they would predict to the greatest ability how AR exists in ASD children, and in what ship canal it hindered them performing everyday activities. In many ways ASD affects children with Autisms AR and temperament. Correct and effective ways to measure these in diagnosed children must be done in order to see what disabilities they may have in performing tasks later on in everyday life.